7 |
Despite these indications of a
nascent development in the law, the current report does
not consider the applicability of Article 2 of the
Statute to the Kosovo conflict. As will be discussed
further below, there has been some dispute about the
actual existence of an "armed conflict" in
Kosovo and, while it is here contended that such a view
is entirely unsupported in law and fact, it is not argued
that the armed conflict was or is international in
nature. (ii) Article 3 Even a cursory glance at the description of the military campaign conducted by the Serbian/FRY authorities in Kosovo, laid out below, suffices to raise the applicability of Article 3 of the Statute particularly paragraphs (b), (c) and (e). The Appeals Chamber, in its Decision on Jurisdiction in the Tadic case, held that Article 3 is applicable in situations of armed conflict, whether international or internal. In addition, the Appeals Chamber described Article 3 as a catch-all provision designed to ensure that the jurisdiction of the International Tribunal is "watertight". In its view, therefore, violations of common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, concerning internal armed conflicts, also fall squarely within the ambit of Article 3 of the Statute, whose enumerated provisions are illustrative rather than exhaustive. Common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions states as follows:
|